If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

POLITICAL COMMENTARY

Democrats' Southern Strategy

A Commentary By Daniel McCarthy

        Don't believe the Democratic National Committee's official storyline -- the DNC's decision to make South Carolina the first Democratic presidential primary in 2028 isn't about introducing more racial diversity into the early contests.

        It's actually about keeping power in the hands of the party establishment, the people who backed Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020, and who are likely to wind up supporting Kamala Harris in 2028.

        The fix is in.

        South Carolina was the establishment's firewall against Bernie Sanders' left-wing insurgency twice over.

        In 2016, Sanders nearly beat Hillary Clinton in the first caucus, in Iowa, and went on to defeat her in the New Hampshire primary.

        Four years later, there was a brief moment when Sanders looked like the frontrunner -- until he got clobbered by Joe Biden in South Carolina.

        It's true that the black voters who make South Carolina's primaries more racially diverse than the contests in Iowa or New Hampshire are also less politically radical, so it's easy for the DNC to say it's not trying to choke off support for the socialist wing of the party, it's just giving black voters more of a say.

        The Democratic Socialists of America, the left fringe of the party, is disproportionately white -- even its New York City chapter is 60% white, according to DSA's own membership polling.
        That's astonishing considering NYC itself is only 34% white.

        This racial split between the Democrats' most ideologically intense faction and the party's elite, which only holds onto power thanks to black voters' loyalty, is a fault line with the potential to reshape American politics.

        South Carolina doesn't just lean toward establishment Democrats, it backs them overwhelmingly -- nearly three quarters of the state's Dem primary voters chose Clinton over Sanders in '16, while Biden beat Sanders in '20 by a ratio of more than 2 to 1.

        A candidate like Harris or her fellow Californian Gavin Newsom fits the profile, and Harris' unbeatable name recognition -- as a former vice president and '24 nominee -- and race-and-sex diversity qualifications likely give her an edge.

        DSA members won't stay home and let another Republican succeed Donald Trump rather than turn out to vote for Harris or Newsom, but if the establishment candidate goes on to lose in November '28, the party will be ripe for a revolution.

        Will black voters who have so far resisted Sanders-style socialism be just as content with a DSA-led party as they have been with the Democrats' old guard?

        With Republican states growing while blue states like California shed population and businesses, the Democrats face a terminal problem in the Electoral College and U.S. House of Representatives.
        With each decennial census, Republicans stand to gain House seats and electoral votes.

        But Democrats can offset the GOP's growth advantages if they start flipping Southern states back into the blue column.

        Georgia is the test case -- the state has prospered under Republican leadership, but that prosperity has fueled the growth of Atlanta and turned many of the city's suburbs blue.

        Virginia, of course, has already become a purple state, if not a reliably Democratic one, and while Washington, D.C. is a unique influence as the center of the federal government, the growth of the state's deep-blue D.C. suburbs -- which keep extending further into Virginia's interior -- is not so different from the effect Atlanta is having on Georgia.

        North Carolina is another weak link in the Republican Party's Southern wall.

        Despite backing a string of losers -- Hillary Clinton a decade ago, Biden and Harris both in the last election -- the Democratic establishment thinks it's hit upon a strategy both for keeping control of the party and wresting the South away from Republicans.

        And it's confident the DSA will fall in line. After all, the elite Democrats are more allergic to the socialist label than they are to socialistic policies.

        They can give DSA much of what it wants, while DSA is just as devoted to identity politics as the establishment is.

        Yet a plan is one thing -- the reality is there's a knife fight for control of the party, and these pieces won't fit together easily.

        That gives Republicans a chance to stop socialism and the Democrats' racial spoils system.

        But to do it they'll have to win the South anew -- thinking of it as a battleground region, rather than taking it for granted.

        Republicans will also have to slow, if they can't immediately reverse, the leftward drift of urban politics.

        South Carolina might not be in play anytime soon, but by holding their first 2028 presidential primaries there, Democrats are executing the first move in a grand strategy Republicans have to be prepared to counter.

        Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review. To read more by Daniel McCarthy, visit www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2026 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary.

See Other Commentaries by Daniel McCarthy.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.